Comparing Feeding Systems In Group Sow Housing

Unlike stall housing, group homes come in several unique shapes and sizes. It's crucial to comprehend the long-term impacts of every system to be good decisions based on staff capacities, barn design, and herd size.

Electronic sow feeder (ESF) and completely free accessibility stall systems are called non-competitive feeding methods.  You can get more information about electronic sow feeders via https://www.feedworks.com.au/.

comparison of electronic sow feeders

Image Source: Google

They're made to provide person feeding to sows and restrict competition for feed by isolating the sows at feeding time, and so that sows have access to feed and can't be displaced by additional sows. 

Short stalls, open stalls, and flooring feeding are called aggressive" feeding methods. The feed is offered in open troughs or straight on the ground, and most of the sows will compete to get access to the source. 

In competitive systems, sows of comparable size and body condition ought to be chosen when gestation classes are shaped. Having sows of size at the group can help to make sure that all sows will succeed when competing for feed.

Handling the transition into group housing may be the most difficult moment. Sows who have spent their prior gestation installs might be more competitive when first combined.

Once sows or gilts become accustomed to being in classes, they learn to become more self-reliant and show less aggression, particularly after repeated mixings.