Is cadence important for runners?

Inside running community there is often a substantial amount of conversation and even obsession for the running form or method with lots of viewpoints, numerous comments from guru’s with a lot of dogma but not much scientific research to guide most of it. The views from the so-called experts and how a runner really should actually run can be varied and quite often contrary, which could leave the typical athlete somewhat perplexed. There are plenty of variables with the different running methods such as where and how the foot contacts the ground as well as the position with the knee and pelvis. One which just recently received a great deal of interest has been the cadence. The actual cadence is how quick the legs turn over, commonly assessed as the quantity of steps taken in a minute.

There are a variety of ways to find the cadence and you will find applications you can use to figure out the cadence. It is simply a matter of counting the number of strides the runner normally takes in a time frame and after that standardizing that to one minute. There was clearly just lately an increasing movement touting for athletes to shorten their step length while increasing the speed which the legs turn over ie raise the cadence. The dogma is that when you can obtain the cadence to about to 180 steps/minute then that is by some means an essential way for you to decrease the chance of injury and increase performance. This 180 steps/minute was made popular by the famous running coach Jack Daniels. Daniels primarily based this on his studies of runners and their step rates at the 1984 Olympics. He widely publicized this as an well suited for most athletes to target.

Since then, the research has shown us that the cadence in runners is normally very variable with some as little as 150-160 yet others are approximately 200 steps a minute. It can seem like it is a quite personal thing without any one perfect cadence. It does appear that every runner will likely have their own ideal cadence and will also differ among runners. Reducing the step length to boost the cadence may appear to have some positive aspects and that is supported by several studies, however what is just not backed up is increasing it to that mythical 180 which has been commonly recommended. It could help with runners that are overstriding and teach them never to reach so far forward when running. It does appear to help runners who have complications with their knee joints because it can decrease the stresses there, but it will nevertheless increase the loads in another place, therefore any changes is going to need to be accomplished slowly , cautiously and progressively.

What exactly is most significant with regard to runners to be aware of is that this is very individual and it is a matter of working out by yourself or through the help of a skilled running technique mentor precisely what is right for you as the individual. One matter which comes out regarding all the hoopla around cadence should be to not be taken in by the newest trend or expert and try to look for the a lot more balanced and considered insights.