What’s the FDA for?

Over the years, the FDA was under pressure in two different ways under the Bush administration. The first is a general cut in funds – something all regulators with the GOP in power have seen. The second is a political attack. You can get more information regarding  FDA drug label via https://wizmed.com/drug.

With the pharmaceutical industry regulating its costs, the FDA is often instructed to approve new drugs with less control or not to investigate reported problems in new licensed departments. If a manufacturer had just spent tens of millions on getting approved, they didn't want anything to stop them from recovering their investment and turning a profit as quickly as possible.

The results are easy to see. The workforce is on the decline and the quality of other people is often less than impressive. Food regulation work has been reduced, enforcement limited because fewer inspections have been conducted and enforcement of potentially hazardous drugs has been limited.

With the new president, funding has increased and regulators are increasingly interested in protecting you as a consumer. One of the most positive signs of this is enforcement action against placement on the natural product market.

The role of the FDA is limited to drugs. Anything classified as "natural" can be sold without first purchasing a license. Unsurprisingly, most manufacturers try to label their products as natural and avoid high costs for clinical trials (especially since those trials may find that natural products have no effect).

The only strength of the FDA is in overseeing the way this product is marketed. If there is any indication that the product has been misrepresented, it may be withdrawn from the market. Now we have less surprising developments as manufacturers of "natural" products try to take advantage of the fact that they are secretly adding real drugs to the mix.